Feed on
Posts
Comments

A True Festivus Miracle

Tonight I shall tell a bone-rattling tale of Festivus MIRACULOUSNESS!

(For an introduction to Festivus, scroll to the bottom of this post.)festivus.jpg

Tuesday evening was chill and damp. After work, I went shopping – because toilet paper and diaper supplies were low, and not having personal heigene products quells the holiday spirit, does it not?

Upon arriving at the ground floor of my apartment building, I saw a young man, one of my neighbors, who never, ever talks to me.

This night he approached me, hesitantly at first, and said (not Happy Holidays, but): “Don’t you live on the third floor? Well, an ambulance took your wife and baby daughter to the HOSPITAL! Your daughter was HURT! There was a lot of BLOOD! Your baby was CRYING! They left about thirty or forty-five MINUTES ago! I don’t know anything ELSE, except that an INDIAN lady is up in your apartment with your other KIDS!”

Well, I didn’t panic. After a few fruitless questions, I thanked the young gentleman and hurried upstairs, with a sick feeling of dread in the pit of my stomach which only a parent can know.

“The Indian lady” must be our friend and neighbor from the next building, the mother of a girl that my children play with. The mother’s English is flawless – all thirty or forty words of it. (Michelle has always been better able to understand her than I.)

There she stood, pensive. My two elder daughters bobbed, ran back and forth, climbed up and down on the sofa, took turns exitedly hugging me, and talked over one another, saying such helpful and informative things as: “Daddy, Saadia got hurt!” “There was blood EVERYwhere!” “Saadia hurt her hand and there was a lot of blood!” “Saadia was crying!” “Mommy was crying!” “We were all crying!” “Two men came and took them to the hospital!” “Saadia hurt her hand in the door and it was bleeding!” “We’ll show you!”

They guided me down the hall, as my gaze roamed up and down and over the walls, and along the carpet for streaks and pools of blood that never materialized. They showed me their bedroom door, and somehow I was made to understand the my precious baby girl had been trying to follow her older sisters into their bedroom, and one of them had shut the door with her finger in it.

Our Indian friend explained that her husband had accompanied Michelle and the baby to the hospital. She dialed his mobile phone number. He explained to me that the baby was all right. He gave me a room number, assured me that everything was under control, that I should come to the hopital but not rush, and that his wife would be happy to continue watching over my children, and I hung up.

I told the children that I would be going to the hospital. Our Indian benefactress asked me if I could drive - I supposed she was asking if I was calm enough to drive, so I answered in the affirmative. She asked me if I needed a Coke before I left. (I thought this was odd, but it later occured to me that “Coke” might have been the only word for “drink” that she could think of.) Reaching some sort of judgment, she gestured for the children to stay and asked me into the kitchen.

She opened the freezer and took out a plastic sandwich bag. In it were two cubes of ice. And the tip of my baby’s finger.

Twenty minutes later, I held the bag up for inspection at the front desk of the hospital and was given instant admittance. (It had occured to me to wonder, however, why the EMT’s had not found the fingertip when they were there. More about this later.)

I found Michelle, Saadia, and our other Indian friend without trouble. There was a moderate amount of blood – a lot, I suppose, for a sixteen-month-old child. It was on Michelle’s shirt and down her arm, with odd splatters on her pants. Blood was on Saadia’s clothing, too, and they both had smears of blood on their faces, just for dramatic effect. What I’m trying to say is, there really was a terrific volume of blood, when you consider the source.

I was able to see for myself where the tip of the ring finger of Saadia’s left hand had been nipped right off. Blood still welled prodigiously from the open end.

I waved down a nurse and gave her the bit that had been left behind. She seemed sceptical that the doctor would be able to re-attach it, saying that it looked like “more of an evulsion than an amputation.” She nevertheless put it carefully in a container for safekeeping.

Shortly thereafter, Michelle and Saadia were taken away to X-ray. Someone from the billing department came and verified our address. I was asked which parent was the decision-maker, and which one was the spokesperson. Michelle is in charge of the medical records and insurance information for the family, and she sets the appointments for vaccinations and check-ups, etc; so, in her absence, I decided to name her “decision-maker” for the family, and I was named “spokesperson.” This was a source of much amusement for my Indian friend.

Michelle and Saadia came back and we waited for hours. But, the surprises were not yet over! A nurse explained to us that one of the EMT’s that had been to my apartment had reported (among other things) that one of my other daughters had a black eye. As a result, we were told, the hospital staff was legally obliged to contact child social services, and there would be an investigation into our fitness as parents.

Human Fund

Now, days after the event, Michelle says she understands things that were said and done by the EMT that baffled her at a time in which she was concerned only with the welfare of her bleeding, crying baby. For now, I will only say that the asshole should have had more competence than to mistake a birthmark for a black eye. He should have attended to the emergency at hand, rather than indulging his own prejudices and launching a private investigation into our supposed abuses. While the man occupied himself for several minutes snooping around our sparsely-appointed apartment, he spent such little effort attending to the accident that he failed to notice Saadia’s fingertip still stuck to the edge of the door where it was removed. I may elaborate on his crass, unprofessional behavior in another post.

That matter caused, I think, a delay in Saadia’s treatment, because a small strike force of professionals had been gathered, and immediately after the nurse informed us of the EMT’s allegations of abuse, they swarmed down on us to ask us leading questions and observe our reactions. In a few short minutes they were satisfied, the team evaporated, and we were left to wait some other indefinite amount of time.

FINALLY, one of the nurses returned. She told us that there was a surgeon who was on his way. She apologized profusely about having to report us to child social services. She told us that no one at the hospital had seen anything that would lead them to suspect us of any kind of misconduct – to the contrary, we seemed like an ordinary, loving couple! Although they were legally required to pass our information on to social services, they included a statement in their report, saying in effect that they saw no behaviour on our part to support the charges.

She was excoriated by my Indian friend, who told her, half-jokingly, that he was going to come back the next day with his infant son, since they had forgotten to document the birthmark on his son’s arm, and he wanted to avoid the hassle of having child welfare investigate him later.

Festivus Miracle GeeksFinally, the surgeon arrived. He told us that he would indeed sew the fingertip back on, for several reasons: first, if he didn’t use the fingertip, he would have to take a graft from somewhere else on her body to cover the area; second, since young children have fantastic recuperative powers, there was a chance that the fingertip would actually “take” and heal perfectly; and third, there was quite a bit of nail with the fingertip, and while the nail was not actually alive, it could be sewn back on with everything else, which would hold the nail bed open, without which the nail would not grow back properly.

So, about six hours after her arrival, Saadia’s fingertip was restored to its rightful place, after which Saadia’s hand was wrapped up thoroughly, like a little boxing glove.

Then we waited another hour for discharge papers and a perscription for antibiotics.

Then, after getting home, I had to go back out for the antibiotics. Then, a few hours sleep. Then, up in the morning to retrieve my daughters (they had spent the night at the home of our Indian friends.) Then I went to work.

Wait a minute! What, you may ask, is the Festivus Miracle? Why, it’s the fact that I didn’t hunt down that EMT and do something I later would have regretted.

Did I mention that my dad had two car accidents in the past week and a half? And that in one of them, he was driving my car?


An introduction to Festivus, for the uninitiated:

… then this woman, Carolyn Porco, practices it.

Prologue

woodcutWell snaars fans, this is where I uncomfortably concede to myself that my philosophy education has had little direct relevance to anything I have done  since receiving my degree. “Direct relevance,” I say - I do not say “no relevance.”

I believe that the study of philosophy enabled me to think clearly about a broad range of subjects, and it helped me to understand … well, it helped me to understand what I understand, and what I cannot claim to understand; what may be understandable, and what is unintelligible. And, it has helped me write a small handful of blog articles that have received attention, in addition to some lengthy comments I’ve gifted to other blogs.Plato

Philosophy cannot be a full-blown pursuit for me, now that I have other commitments; I consider it to be— well, something of a hobby. Having invested much time in search of truth and wisdom, I still have love for that endeavor. I think a lot of people do, and could benefit from understanding what a philosophy education is about.

Many people have the silly and mutually contradictory ideas that a) philosophy is a waste of time and mental effort because nothing constructive can be gained from it, and b) anyone can do it well. Popular philosophies such as those found in New Age and Self-Help sections of your local bookstore probably bear little resemblance or relation to college-level academic philosophy.

Academic philosophy is a long tradition, going back over three thousand years to ancient Greece. The word “philosophy” comes from Greek and means, literally, “the love of wisdom.” It is in that spirit, the love of wisdom, that I begin this series on philosophical topics.

What Philosophy Is

AristotleOther disciplines claim to be paths to wisdom. So what makes philosophy different from other ways of knowing or understanding— like science, or religion? HumeA simple answer (by way of introduction) is that philosophy has much in common with science and religion— but it is more closely related to science.

Philosophy and science are both collections of sub-disciplines. Subdisciplines within science include: biology, physics, chemistry, astronomy, anthropology, sociology, etc.

Subdisciplines within philosophy include:

  • ethics and morality - seeks to understand right conduct
  • epistemology - seeks answers to questions like, “What is knowledge and how do we get some? What is truth and how do we recognize it?”
  • logic - seeks an understanding of what sorts of reasoning are most effective, or likely to lead to truth
  • metaphysics - seeks answers to questions such as “What exists (if anything?),” “What are properties? Relations? Numbers?” and “Is there free will?”
  • aesthetics - seeks to understand beauty
  • philosophy of religion - seeks answers to questions such as “Does God exist, and if so, what characteristics does she possess?”
  • philosophy of science - seeks answers to questions such as “What makes one scientific theory better than a rival scientific theory?” and “Do the theoretical entities posited by science really exist?”
  • philosophy of mind and cognition* - seeks to understand how the minds functions— not biologically, but logically. How does the mind do what it does? What is consciousness?

Bertrand RussellThe methods of science include the use of careful observation and reasoning. Philosophy, in contrast, relies heavily on the use of reason alone, and less on empirical observation. Scientists and philosophers alike presuppose that there are answers to the questions they ask.

Science and contemporary academic philosophy share common roots. At one time, no distinction was made between the two; the pursuit of knowledge through reason and observation was known as “natural philosophy.” In the intervening centuries, the “natural philosophers” have become more specialized in their goals and educations, giving rise to the sciences as we know them today*.

Philosophy and science are dissimilar in that philosophy addresses topics and questions that science cannot – even in principle – answer.Karl Popper

What does philosophy teach? 

Philosophy is not a particular teaching. Philosophy is a set of tools and methods for analyzing, evaluating, and comparing the relative merits of ideas, and for utilizing the knowledge thus gained to construct new and better ways of thinking.

It is not the case that all ideas are equal; some are better than others. Philosophy is the testing ground where concepts compete. They are accepted or rejected provisionally based upon the evidence and the best critical thinking methods available. Dealing with ideas in this manner requires a degree of detachment and a capacity to think abstractly.

Philosophy is a rigorous discipline which requires care and Hard Work— the benefits of which have been and continue to be profound.


*The newest discipline coming out of philosophy is cognitive science, which has attracted researchers from such diverse fields as neuroscience, psychology, biology, computer science, physics, and linguistics. A primary focus of cognitive science has been the construction of artificial intelligence.


Watch this blog space for the future posts dealing with philosophy basics, brought directly to you in exclusive snaarsivison!


(After finishing this composition, my daughter, Havilah, pointed to one of the pictures and asked, “What’s that?” Plato, I replied. “Oh, so that’s what it’s made of. The sculpture, I mean,” she said, not seeing the humor and becoming indignant as I chuckled.)

I’ve been contemplating a series of posts that cover the basics of academic philosophy. It’s been over two and a half years now since I’ve been in a philosophy classroom, and as I predicted at that time, I have in no way become a professional philosopher. Still, the process of learning the basics of the discipline has had a profound affect on the course of my life.

Ironically, I might have been happier and more confident had I not studied philosophy. And yet, I am absolutely certain that I was improved by my efforts.

Readers may be interested to know that I had intended to continue my education after getting my bachelor’s degree in philosophy, and go on to become a rabbi. My philosophy education gave me the tools to analyze my own beliefs in ways I had never before imagined, and this changed me irrevocably.

Since I deconverted to a humanistic, atheistic world-view, life has been a struggle. I was ethically constrained from pursuing my chosen vocation, and I’ve not found another to take its place.

Although I’m not making much money yet and it’s hard not to overspend my meager earnings, it beats working sixty and seventy hour weeks. Who would want to sacrifice the limited time allotted to him, who has a loving wife, and children who need to play? It is for them that I’m not still in school pursuing a doctorate - so I enjoy the advantages of what I have.

I was thinking of starting with some posts on basic logic, then graduating to some concepts and theories in epistomology, metaphysics, philosophy of religion, and critical thinking. 

Better writers have already posted on such things in the blogosphere— but none have the snaars charm that will make the whole project so interesting! :wink:

I was still standing although
Gavriella Wells and Barbara Ryan were too,
their bodies dark against the wall of light that dull-pewter December afternoon,
shadows with words that flowed
so easily from their mouths,
fluorescent and grievous,
pied and effervescent,
words I’d spelled out to the rhythm
of my father’s hoarse whispers
during our nightly practice sessions
beneath the dim bulb,
superfluous, excelsior,
desultory and exaggeration
mixed with his Schaefer breath
and Lucky Strike smoke

as I went down
The List of Most Difficult Words
with a man whose wife had left,
one son grown into madness,
the other into death,
my father’s hundred-and-five-pound skeleton
of skin glowing in that beer-flooded kitchen
when he’d lift the harmonica

to blow a few long, sad riffs
of country into a song
while he waited for me to hit
the single l of spiraling,
the silent i of receipt,
the two of us working words hard
those nights on Olmstead Street,
sure they would someday save me.

What I like about this poem is that its meaning changes every time I read it. To me, that’s one of the hallmarks of good art.

What does the poem say about the relationship between a self-destructive parent and his child? What does it say about hope? About education? About competition?

Belief systems chart

Updated 10/28/07 — Ken Perrot’s comment has inspired me to alter the original chart:
Systems of Belief Chart, updated

Old chart:
Systems of Belief Chart
(click on thumbnails to enlarge.)

So much to write, so little time…

The snaars wife: I don’t often write about her, but snaars fans should know that she is central and indispensable to the phenomenon.

Seriously, Michelle has borne the brunt of the family’s troubles of the last two years or so. We are healing from the disaster that ensued after our move north, and Michelle has had to do the most. In an unfamiliar house, far from anyplace we had ever called home, we found she was pregnant with our third child. Rejected by the family she had so long wanted to be reunited with, we faced another move and the premature burden of being on our own before I had stable employment.

Regular visits with my parents kept us sane. We made the 2.5 hour trip at least once a month (usually twice) for a long time. My parents also loaned us a LOT of money. I think they felt partially responsible, because before the move their encouragement allayed any doubts we had felt.

Michelle had it worse than I did in a lot of ways, coming to grips with the reality of the dynamics of her family (past and present), and doing the bulk of the parenting work: getting the kids into school, enduring a third pregnancy and a difficult home labor and birth, then taking care of an infant on top of everything else - all in a place where we had very little money, or support from anyone.

During the first months in the apartment and throughout the pregnancy I suffered from panic attacks. I went to work every day knowing I wasn’t making enough money. I came home wanting to do something else to make money and feeling helpless. Michelle and I both felt tired, but we couldn’t sleep.

Despite all this, Michelle continued to volunteer many hours per week to the Childbirth and Postpartum Professionals Association, as their public relations coordinator and director of state representatives. I think she had clung to the position as something over which she could have some control during a time when everything else seemed out of control.

Meanwhile, because of our obligations as parents to our first two lovely daughters, we couldn’t slow down or focus on our own needs as much as we should have done.

I have had five jobs in the past two years, with bouts of unemployment in-between. This last job has been going very well. I have had steady employment for five months now, and although our expenses still outweigh our income, the discrepancy is minimal; we’ve been making stead progress and I expect the trend to continue. Soon, we will be restoring our savings. I expect we’ll be buying a house within six months or a year.

I have been working with some wonderful people. They have been impressed with me and my work. I did not get this job through the staffing agency, but through an aquaintance I made while working for the agency. Within a week of getting the job, I was offered another job at a different company. Not only was I able to negotiate better benefits from my employer because of it - I actually managed to go back to the company that had given me the second offer, and I set up a complementary schedule with them, so that I was able to work both jobs.

The second job has since evaporated, but it was good for the several months it lasted. I am on good terms with the owner of the business.

After working with my current employer for three months, they gave me a considerable raise. And today - just this morning - they brought me into a meeting to discuss sending me back to school to take accounting and/or IT courses. They advised me that the combination of accounting and IT has considerable earning potential. They are willing to reimburse me 100% for tuition and expenses.

The only requirement is that I make at least a B in whatever courses I want to take. (I didn’t feel it necessary to bring to their attention that I aced almost all my courses at UL - I think they know I’m capable.)

Sometimes it’s good to be the snaars!

Simcha turns six this week! She wants a Care Bear more than anything. (I’m just glad she’s over the Bratz doll obsession of the last few months!)

I’ll write more about the kids soon - I know that’s what all the real snaars fans ache for - but for now, it’s past my bedtime.

courtesy of the GSA:

  1. Homosexuality is not natural, much like eyeglasses, polyester, and birth control are not natural.
  2. Heterosexual marriages are valid because they produce children. Infertile couples and old people cannot get legally married because the world needs more children.
  3. Obviously gay parents will raise gay children because straight parents only raise straight children.
  4. Straight marriage will be less meaningful, since Britney Spears’s 55-hour just-for-fun marriage was meaningful.
  5. Heterosexual marriage has been around for a long time, and it hasn’t changed at all: women are property, Blacks can’t marry Whites, and divorce is illegal.
  6. Gay marriage should be decided by the people, not the courts, because the majority-elected legislatures, not courts, have historically protected the rights of minorities.
  7. Gay marriage is not supported by religion. In a theocracy like ours, the values of one religion are always imposed on the entire country. That’s why we only have one religion in America.
  8. Gay marriage will encourage people to be gay, in the same way that hanging around tall people makes you tall.
  9. Legalizing gay marriage will open the door to all kinds of crazy behavior. People may even wish to marry their pets because a dog has legal standing and can sign a marriage license.
  10. Children can never succeed without both male and female role models at home. That’s why single parents are forbidden to raise children.
  11. Gay marriage will change the foundation of society. Heterosexual marriage has been around for a long time, and we could never adapt to new social norms because we haven’t adapted to cars or longer lifespans.
  12. Civil unions, providing most of the same benefits as marriage with a different name are better, because a “separate but equal” institution is always constitutional. Separate schools for African-Americans worked just as well as separate marriages will for gays & lesbians.

See also: Do you think you may be straight? (Oh my god - as if being an atheist wasn’t enough - am I straight, too?)

Cone Friend

One day while jogging down the street,
I stopped to rest my weary feet,
Beneath a tree I saw a sight,
That filled my heart with joy and light,
A cone! A beautiful cone stood tall,
Waiting for me to call,
And lead him to our little home,
And stay with us and never roam,
Our hearts have been happy, our spirits always soar,
Ever since that little angel came through our door.

The preceding poem was found on “The Snarson’s” famiy home page. Is the similarity of name mere coincidence? Or could it be yet another glimpse into the divine and infinitely labarynthian plan of the snaars?

Extended Mind Thesis

I touched on the idea of the extended mind over a year ago, when I wrote “love, pizza, grief, and personal identity. At the time, I had not heard the idea named, and did not know that the extended mind thesis is a well-developed and hot topic in cognitive science and philosophy of mind. I find it fascinating:

From Wikipedia:

The Extended Mind refers to an emerging concept within the philosophy of mind that addresses the question as to the division point between the mind and the environment by promoting the view of active externalism. This view proposes that some objects in the external environment are utilized by the mind in such a way that the objects can be seen as extensions of the mind itself. Specifically, the mind is seen to encompass every level of the cognitive process, which will often include the use of environmental aids.

The primary body of work in the field is The Extended Mind, by Andy Clark and David Chalmers. In this paper, Clark and Chalmers present the idea of active externalism, (similar to semantic or “content” externalism,) in which objects within the environment function as a part of the mind. They argue that it is arbitrary to say that the mind is contained only within the boundaries of the skull. The separation between the mind, the body, and the environment is seen as an unprincipled distinction. Because external objects play a significant role in aiding cognitive processes, the mind and the environment act as a “coupled system.” This coupled system can be seen as a complete cognitive system of its own. In this manner, the mind is extended into the external world. The main criterion that Clark and Chalmers outline for approaching the use of external environmental objects utilized during cognitive tasks as a part of an extended cognitive system is that the external objects must function with the same purpose as the internal processes.

In The Extended Mind, a thought experiment is presented to further illustrate the environment’s role in connection to the mind. The fictional characters Otto and Inga are both travelling to a museum simultaneously. Otto has Alzheimer’s Disease, and has written all of his instructions down on in a notebook to serve the function of his memory. Inga is able to recall the internal instructions within her memory. In a traditional sense, Inga can be thought to have had a belief as to the location of the museum before consulting her memory. In the same manner, Otto can be said to have held a belief of the location of the museum before consulting his notebook. The argument is that the only difference existing in these two cases is that Inga’s memory is being internally processed by the brain, while Otto’s memory is being served by the notebook. In other words, Otto’s mind has been extended to include the notebook as the source of his memory.

From “Collective memory, group minds, and the extended mind thesis” abstract

While memory is conceptualized predominantly as an individual capacity in the cognitive and biological sciences, the social sciences have most commonly construed memory as a collective phenomenon. Collective memory has been put to diverse uses, ranging from accounts of nationalism in history and political science to views of ritualization and commemoration in anthropology and sociology. These appeals to collective memory share the idea that memory “goes beyond the individual” but often run together quite different claims in spelling out that idea.

I should note for any interested readers that in philosophy, the words “internalism” and “externalism” can mean different things depending on the subject matter. For instance, when discussing theories of knowledge, internalism and externalism refer to different kinds of theories regarding epistemic justification (e.g., reliable process v. coherence or mental states).

In this instance, externalism refers to the idea that a part of the mind or memory is located outside of the brain. I am quite at ease with this notion, and I feel that it is almost certainly true, although there are quite a lot of details to be worked out.


Questions (idle, amateurish ones all):

Is the extended mind idea plausible? Is the idea compatible with other well-supported theories of how the mind works?

If the extended mind exists, is it the case that it makes real - that is, enables the existence of - group minds, analogous to individual minds that actually think and react to stimuli? Or, is the extended mind merely an ability of the individual mind to store, retrieve, and/or process information externally, using the environment?

Does this inform theories of group consciousness and group memory? I am sceptical of both, but it seems to me that if extended consciousness is demonstrated, then perhaps it could be a mechanism for the functioning of some kind of group consciousness or shared memory.

How does this impact our notions of community, morality and personal moral responsibility?

Since I had not heard of the extended mind when I first started writing about it, is it the case that I absorbed the idea from some sort of group consciousness, made possible by the extended mind?

Related topics: innatism/nativism, memetics.

Older Posts »